Arab-Islamic Ministerial Committee Object U.S Veto Blocking Calls for Gaza Ceasefire
In a recent high-stakes meeting with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the Arab-Islamic Ministerial Committee expressed strong objections to US use of veto regarding Gaza war and international calls for UN Security Council to demand ceasefire in Gaza, as reported by the Saudi Press Agency (SPA).
The Arab-Islamic Ministerial Committee’s Stance
Moreover, the Arab-Islamic Ministerial Committee, representing a significant part of the Arab world, voiced concerns that the US’s unilateral actions could destabilize regional security. They also emphasized the need for more inclusive and democratic processes in international decision-making bodies.
On the other hand, US Secretary of State Blinken defended the use of the veto as a necessary tool for protecting national interests and maintaining global stability. He emphasized that the US remains committed to working collaboratively with international partners but will not hesitate to use its veto power when necessary.
Implications for Future Diplomatic Relations
Furthermore, this confrontation signifies a potential shift in diplomatic relations between the United States and the Arab-Islamic committee. It raises questions about the effectiveness of current international governance structures and the role of superpowers in shaping global policies.
As the meeting concluded, both parties recognized the need for continued dialogue and cooperation. The Arab-Islamic Ministerial Committee’s objections to the US veto highlight the complexities of international diplomacy. In addition to the importance of finding common ground.
Related Topics
Saudi FM, Blinken Hold Talks over Gaza, Israeli-Hamas War
